I have not seen this happen before, but I would check the account numbers set up for the assets this is happening to, I would suspect they are not correct from what you are describing.

-Victoria

I am using GP 10 and have noticed something odd happening to a handful of our fixed assets. Occasionally when depreciation is ran, a FAADD transaction will show up in the clearing account related to an asset that is already in the FA Module. The transaction credits the clearing account and debits the equipment account. Do you know what would be causing this to happen?

Thank you,
Kelly

You mean closing the same module in two different companies at the same time? This is very difficult to answer without having a lot more information, like the size of your data, the resources available on your server and network, etc. However, in general, if there are enough resources, there should be no issue with running the year-end process in two companies at the same time.

-Victoria

Our fiscal year is about to end and we need to close each module. The problem now is our server as of now have two companies running in two databases. Is it advisable to simultaneously perform the closing of modules?

This does not sound like something I have run into in the the past, but it’s really difficult to tell without actually seeing it. Have you asked your GP partner to look at this for you and see if they can provide some guidance?

-Victoria

thanks for your help!

I didn’t reblog your script, but had no problem copying it with the braces and it runs fine. I have made a modication to your script which you may be interested in. Basically I changed a couple of the selections to match the AGPERAMT buckets in GP – where AGPERAMT1 is Current and AGPERAMT2 is 1-30 Days.

Example:

sum(CASE
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) > 0
and RM.RMDTYPAL < 7 THEN RM.CURTRXAM
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) > 0
and RM.RMDTYPAL > 6 THEN RM.CURTRXAM * -1
ELSE 0
END) as [Past_Due],

sum(CASE
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) < 1
and RM.RMDTYPAL < 7 THEN RM.CURTRXAM
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) < 1
and RM.RMDTYPAL > 6 THEN RM.CURTRXAM * -1
ELSE 0
END) as [Current_Due],  --AGPERAMT_1

sum(CASE
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) between 1 and 30
and RM.RMDTYPAL < 7 THEN RM.CURTRXAM
WHEN DATEDIFF(d, RM.DUEDATE, getdate()) between 1 and 30
and RM.RMDTYPAL > 6 THEN RM.CURTRXAM * -1
ELSE 0
END) as [Days_1_to_30],  --AGPERAMT_2

If you are entering this on the Internet Information window, it is stored in the SY01200 table.

-Victoria

In which table can I find creditor e-mail addresses in GP10?

Typically orders with no customer ID are orphaned records that just need to get cleared out…. Are these orders in SOP10100 or SOP30200? Have you run Check Links on the Sales Series to see if that clear these up?

-Victoria

There is no requirement that a debit or a credit memo has to ‘relate’ to an invoice. So, this is not a GP question so much as it is a question for your accounting department. Give them the specific debit and credit numbers and ask them. If they say…’oh, this goes with SOP invoice XXXXX’, ask them how they know this – is there something they have entered into GP that tells them this? If so, where is it?

-Victoria

Thanks for previously answering my questions, very helpful. I have identified several DEBITS in the RM20101 & RM20201 tables that I am unable to identify its corresponding SOP Invoice record. The APTODCNM = ‘DBT00XXXXX’ and the ‘APFRDCNM = ‘CRT00XXXXX’. I am not understanding what exactly this debits are related to? Are they debiting credits previously attached? (I have confirmed in this particular system prefix DBT & CRT are infact debits & credits and confirmed using RMDTYPAL field). Any insight into this matter would greatly be appreciated.

- Dave

I just looked at the reblog of my post on your blog and I see that all the brackets around the column names are stripped out. As I mentioned before, WordPress has some special functionality for posting code…perhaps that is causing this not to be picked up properly when it is reblogged? Is it possible to create a link back to my blog for the code instead of reblogging the whole post? Maybe that would avoid a lot of issues. I see this is not isolated, for example, you will have the same problem with this one.

I just tested copying the code directly from my blog using both Google Chrome and IE 9.0 with SQL 2008 R2 and am not seeing any issue with the brackets.

-Victoria